It should be said that this too is from a sphere of mytology and belief (or let´s say from a philosophical view outside of naturalism).
However, in principal i find atheist arguments to be just as unscientific, unhistorical, biased, ethnocentric, and downright unintellectual as many religous ones.
And why shouldent they be?
Both are belief systems after all.
Atheism or theism, neither has any base whatsoever in science (one of them just pretend to).
In the first video the young, atheist , girl equates “conclusion” with “truth”, already proving that her knowledge of philosophy are not nearly good enough to make a video on the rationalityof religous belief or practice.
She also says that a lot of trangressions against humanity are because of religion / belief.
In fact, very little of that has been done for purely religous reasons.
Most conflicts have had a whole complex of reasons where religous sense of group identity has been very useful.
People, btw, have been killed in the name of atheism too (for instance in communist regimes).
She also, like so many Christians cant understand or respect that everyone just doesent get “saved” like her. Why not simply agree with her?
The world would be a much better place if you did. Hallelujah!
“Can i get an atheism saves brothers and sisters?”